Increasing length/speed

[yvi]

So, I am (quite successfully) doing the Couch-to-5k program at the moment. I just completed week 6 today, which means I can now very slowly run 25 minutes without stopping. There are only three more weeks of the program left and they are all 3 days of the same length. Next week's will be 25 minutes, the week after 28 minutes, after that 30 minutes.

I am an extremely slow runner/jogger right now. I did the 25 minutes on a hilly section, but my 20 minute run in rather plan terrain the week before, which wasn't any faster than today's, was only 2 kilometers long. However, on June 16th, I want to run a 5K. I am moving in July and want to do a 5K before that - but the only one that is going on n my hometown in June is a rather fast one. last year, the slowest 5K runner did the run in 43 minutes. This seems like madness to me right now. I don't want to be particularly fast, of course, but jogging the whole course and not finishing ten minutes after the second-to-last person would be nice :)

And this is where I am asking the wisdom of you people :) The path I am running now is really beautiful and I hate having to turn around and go back. The full path would be 4.5 kilometers, though. Do you think I can already do one of my runs as a 'long run' and jog/walk that distance? Would that make sense?

Comments

[blnchflr]

Then, I think (and as far as I can tell, it's what all current research says) you'll get more out of increasing your speed.

I don't know if your mind is where mine is (/was, except it still goes against my intuition), but it may not seem logical that you can increase your stamina over longer distances by running faster over (much!!) short distances - when you push yourself to run an extra 5 mins or ½K, then you can see that you've improved, whereas when you train faster running over much short distances, you have to hope you improve, but can't tell until you try a longer run.

But it has worked for me - and even so, I'm still tempted to do too many of my training runs as distance/endurance runs, because I want to see just how it's improved me :o)

[ilanarama]

I'm not entirely sure I understand you, Skuf, but what I think you are saying is wrong. :-) See the post I made a week or so ago here about how to get faster. The best way for a low-volume runner (by which I mean, someone who runs very little per week) to get faster is to run more, even if that running is slow. Once you are running ~50K/week, then it is time to think about speedwork. On the other hand, it can be quite boring running all runs at the identical slow speed, so there is nothing wrong with running one's shortest runs a little faster.

It's possible it just seems to have worked for you because you haven't run any real distance yet, and I am sorry if that sounds dismissive. But you don't build aerobic endurance by running lots of short intervals hard.

[blnchflr]

I'm definitely not suggesting a beginner should run hard (which I tried to be clear about by saying "I don't mean you should sprint or anything!" above, but possibly not clear enough), merely to pick up the pace.

I'm getting in shape faster than I ever have before, but you're right that I have still to run longer distances!